Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
GARIMA PRASHAD, J
Smt. Samiya And Another – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. safety and security measures for couples facing family opposition. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. mandatory directive for assessing threat perception. (Para 6) |
| 3. court's directive on approaching authorities for protection. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. clarification of the court’s non-judgmental stance on marriage validity. (Para 11) |
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:-
"I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.1 to 3 to protect the life of the petitioners and also direct the respondent No.2 & 3 to grant protection to the petitioners from illegal hindrance of respondent No.4 in peaceful marital life of the petitioners and not to harass the family members of the petitioner No.2."
3. It is submitted that the petitioners, both major Muslims, aged about 20 years and 33 years, have solemnized their marriage against the wishes of the family of petitioner No.1. It is stated that owing to the age difference and the apprehension that this is not the first marriage of petitioner No.2, the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
