1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, learned A.G.A. for the State - respondent and perused the material available on record.

2. The instant criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist against the impugned order dated 24.8.2023, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Mainpuri, Session Trial No.22 of 2021 (State v. Rahul and others), arising out of Case Crime No.235 of 2020, under S.32, S.302, S.504, S.506 IPC, Police Station Dannahar, District Mainpuri. By the impugned order, learned Sessions Judge has allowed Application 13 - A filed by the informant Smt. Reeta Devi under S.319 CrPC and summoned named accused Archana to face trial in the case for charges under S.32, S.302, S.504, S.506 IPC together with accused who are already facing trial.

3. Factual matrix of the case in brief are that the informant Geeta Devi, wife of Late Vinod Kumar, lodged and FIR on 12.9.2020 at 11:44 hours, at police station concerned on the basis of a written report with averment that a hand pipe is installed in her house but Rahul, who is son of her brother - in - law (jeth) was creating obstructions when she tried to fetch water from the hand