SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(All) 95095

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Jaspreet Singh, J.
Mukul Bahl v. Ranjan Mittal


1. Heard Shri Vibhor Vardhan, Advocate assisted by Shri Tungesh Pandey, Dr. Shipra Tripathi, Gayatri Singh, Ajeet Kumar Yadav and Harsh Vardhan learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate assisted by Shri Satya Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioners have invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Art.227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 13.1.2025 passed by Commercial Court No.1, Lucknow in Arbitration Case No.132/2020 whereby an application preferred by the petitioners purporting to be under Order VII R.10 CPC, has been rejected.

3. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that a partnership firm was constituted on 15.3.2012 with Anil Mayor, HUF through its Karta Anil Mayor and Ranjan Mittal. The business of the firm was to be conducted under the name and style of 'Mayor Constructions'. The said partnership Deed in Clause 17 contained an Arbitration Clause to the effect that "any dispute between the parties would be resolved through arbitration."

4. It is the case of the petitioners that initially a dispute arose between the partn

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top