SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 329

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GENERAL MANAGER UP POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SUNITA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD General Manager Up Power Corporation Limited And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s)

Versus Sunita And Another .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :

Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

1. Heard Amit Saxena, holding brief of Sri Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging award of the Permanent Lok Adalat, Bhadoi, dated 07.04.2025, passed in Case No.4 of 2022.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the award under challenge is without jurisdiction as the Permanent Lok Adalat passing the said award was not duly constituted as contemplated under Section 22B of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. It has further been argued by learned counsel for the petitioners that a Permanent Lok Adalat notified for an area under sub-section 1 of Section 22B consists of one judicial member and two non judicial members as provided in sub- section 2 of Section 22B. In the case in hand, the award has been passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat comprising of the Chairman as the judicial member and one non judic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top