SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 350

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUGHAR PAL SINGH AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Sughar Pal Singh And 2 Others .....Revisionist(s)

Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Abhishek Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The present criminal revision has been filed by the revisionists against the order dated 26.11.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 11, Meerut, in S.T. No. 559 of 2023 (State versus Sughar Pal Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 302 of 2019, under Sections 307, 324, 504, and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Pallavpuram, District Meerut.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionists has submitted that the impugned order dated 26.11.2024 has been passed without proper consideration of the evidence and record and is, therefore, liable to be set aside. It is further submitted that the impugned order on framing of charge has been passed in a mechanical manner. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has failed to appreciate the injuries of the revisionist Sughar Pal Singh and has not considered how he could have sustaine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top