IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Harshit @ Honey – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Harshit @ Honey .....Appellant(s)
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Paritosh Sukla, Shashwat Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Krishna Kant Dubey, Santosh Kumar Dubey Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Santosh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for informant/ respondent and Sri R.K. Singh, learned AGA for State.
2. This criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of The Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred by the appellant against the summoning order dated 09.08.2024 passed by Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, Gautam Budh Nagar in Complaint Case No. 150 of 2024 (Kamlesh Devi v/s Radha Sharma and others), under sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(1) (Da), 3(1) (Dha) S.C./S.T. Act, at Police Station Jewar, District Gautam Budh Nagar pending in the court of Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, Gautam Budh Nagar, whereby the court concerned has wrongly summoned the appellant in the present complaint case.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the learned Trial Court has committed gross illegality by co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.