SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 482

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
CHARAN SINGH SHARMA AND 7 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Charan Singh Sharma And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Mishra, Neha Chauhan, Sr.

Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C.

Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.

HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

1. Heard Shri Krishna Mishra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Neha Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioners; Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State respondents; Ms. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (in short "Authority") and Shri J.N. Maurya, learned counsel for U.P. Pollution Control Board.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead U.P. Pollution Control Board as party respondent forthwith.

3. The instant writ petition has been preferred for following reliefs:-

"(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 23.12.2025 passed by the respondent no.3 and consequential letter dated

09.01.2026 (Annexure No.7 and 8 to the writ petition).

(II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top