SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 552

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJAY KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 889 of 2026 Ajay Kumar Pandey .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gaurang Dwivedi, Vimlendu Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 70 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Purushottam Maurya, learned counsel for the State-respondent and perused the record.

2. This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant Ajay Kumar Pandey @ Annu Maharaj @ Pandey Jee seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.127 of 2025, under Sections 27A N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Kadaura, District Jalaun.

3. Tersely, as per the allegation contained in the FIR two accused persons were spot arrested from whose possession 56 Kg 268 gram of contraband ganja, which was kept in Toyota Etios bearing registration no.CG10EL5400, was recovered and on their confessional statement name of applicant was surfaced.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused-applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in this case. Applicant is languishing in jail since 16.12.202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top