SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 614

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PASCHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RIYASAT ALI AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Executive Engineer, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus Riyasat Ali And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Nitin Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.

Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

1. Heard Sri Mata Prasad, holding brief of Sri Abhay Nitin Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3.

2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the award of the Permanent Lok Adalat, Rampur, dated 10.7.2025, passed in PLA Suit No.57 of 2022.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the Permanent Lok Adalat does not require to adjudicate a dispute, unless attempts have been made for conciliation and settlement. However, in this case, after exchange of pleadings, the Permanent Lok Adalat proceeded to frame the issues and decided the dispute without resorting to conciliation proceedings. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Canara Bank Vs. G S Jayarama, reported in 2022 LiveLaw (SC)

499. Relevant paragraphs 26 and 27 are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top