SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 725

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ANIL KUMAR AND 7 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 27262 of 2025 Anil Kumar And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dileep Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.

HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

Heard Mr. Raghvendra Pratap, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Dileep Kumar Vishwakarma, the learned counsel for petitioners and the learned A.G.A. for State/respondents-1,2 and 3.

Perused the record.

Petitioners- Anil Kumar and 7 Others have approached this Court by means of present criminal misc. writ petition challenging the F.I.R. dated 1.10.2025, lodged by first informant/respondent-3 Rubi Devi, and registered as Case Crime No. 344 of 2025, under Section 85, 352, 115 (2), BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Govind Nagar, District- Kanpur Nagar. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that F.I.R. impugned in present writ petition is not only malicious but also an abuse of process of the Court. As such, same is liable to be quashed by this Court. In furtherance of aforesaid submission, the learned counsel for petitioners fairly submits that alm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top