SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 813

Vijai Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


RESERVED A.F.R.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Vijai Kumar Yadav …..Petitioner(s)

Versus State of U.P. and 3 others …..Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Khare, Sr. Advocate, Siddharth Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shashi Prakash Singh, C.S.C., Syed Nadeem Ahmad Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shashi Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the respondent-BSA and Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 27.06.2019 passed by Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Mau.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction of suitable nature restraining the respondents from taking any action on the basis of the order impugned.

(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction of suitable nature commanding the respondents not to interfere in the working of the petitioner as Assistant Teacher under the respondents and to pay the petitioner his regular monthly salary on the said post regularly every month.

(iv) Issue any other suitable writ, order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top