SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(All) 4153

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Zulfikar Ahmad And 7 Others vs. Jahangir Alam


Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:185522 Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6479 of 2021 Petitioner :- Zulfikar Ahmad And 7 Others Respondent :- Jahangir Alam Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinayak Mithal Counsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Dhama,Raj Kumar Singh,Rajat Aren,Sheetla Sahai Srivastava Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

1. Heard Sri Vinayak Mithal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rajat Aren and Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners do not want to file rejoinder affidavit and the petition may be heard and decided on the basis of pleadings available on record.

3. Petitioners before this Court are tenants in the premises in question of respondent no. 1. The release application for the two shops in question was filed by respondent/ landlord on the ground of personal need to open a shop to carry out motorcycle and scooter repairing works, which he was doing in a premises taken on rent and the landlord of that premises, according to him, had asked him to vacate the premises. The release application stood granted by the Prescribed Authority finding the bonafide need to be in existence and compar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top