Reserved HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Tribhawan Goyal …..Petitioner Versus State of U.P. and others …..Respondents Counsel for Petitioner : Prem Sagar Verma, Tripathi B.G.

Bhai Counsel for Respondents : Anupam Kulshreshtha, C.S.C., Devesh Kumar Sharma In Chamber HON’BLE J.J. MUNIR, J.

1. This petition is directed against an order of interim stay and interim injunction dated 25.03.2025 passed by the Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj in Revision No.1039/2025/ Mathura. A short counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent No.3, taking a plea that this petition is not maintainable.

2. We do not propose to decide that objection for the present. The reason is that when this matter was taken up on 22.04.2025, elaborate submissions were advanced before us on the point of widespread caveat mismanagement said to be rife in the Board of Revenue at Prayagraj, Lucknow and the two Circuit Benches of the Board at Agra and Meerut.

3. The revisionist before the Board, upon whose motion the revision was admitted to hearing and an interim stay and injunction granted by the impugned order, was Ashok Kumar, respondent No.5. The complaint was that without serving the petitioner with a