AFR Reserved HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Awadhesh Kumar Chaudhary …..Petitioners(s)

And 6 Others Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others …..Respondents(s)

Counsel for Petitioners(s) : Siddharth Khare, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Archana Singh, C.S.C.

With WRIT - A No. - 8766 of 2025 Sweety Shokeen And 3 Others …..Petitioners(s)

Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others …..Respondents(s)

Counsel for Petitioners(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Archana Singh, C.S.C.

Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

1. The petitioners have preferred instant writ petitions challenging orders dated 09.05.2025 and 21.05.2025 passed by respondent no. 3¹ and respondent no. 4² respectively, whereby services of the petitioners have been terminated on the ground of mentioning increased marks in the application forms submitted by them while applying for the posts of Assistant teachers.

2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the State Government issued a Government Order dated 01.12.2018 notifying the holding of Assistant

1 The Secretary Board of basic Education, UP Prayagraj

2 District Basic Education Ofiicer , Kushinagar (BSA)

Teachers Recruitment Examinati