Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Ajit Kumar, Swarupama Chaturvedi, JJ
Raj Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition, the nature of the claim, and the factual timeline regarding election duty and subsequent death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding the sufficiency of medical documentation and allegations of forgery. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's analysis of document veracity, emphasizing the need for administrative verification of institutional records rather than relying on inconsistent signatures. (Para 7 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final order quashing the rejection and directing reconsideration of the compensation claim. (Para 13 , 14) |
1. Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pradeepta Kumar Shahi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner is seeking quashing of the order dated 02.07.2022 passed by the District Magistrate, Etawah whereby representation of the petitioner dated 25.5.2025 for grant of compensation has been rejected. Alternatively, it is prayed that the respondents be directed to give the benefit of ex-gratia to the petitioner as per the Government Order dated 01.6.2021.
3. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
