IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Sunita Minor And Another vs. State Of U.P. And 8 Others
Versus State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 85 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.
1. Learned A.G.A. prays for and is granted two weeks' time to obtain instructions and ensure the production of the minor corpus before this Court on the next date of hearing.
2. Put up this matter on 04.11.2025 as fresh.
A. Tripathi
AKHILESH TRIPATHI
Versus State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 88 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.
1. In compliance with the order dated 6.10.2025, the corpus has been produced before this Court.
2. Due to paucity of time, the matter could not be taken up.
3. Put up on 11.11.2025 as fresh.
4. On the next date of hearing, the corpus shall remain present before this Court.
A. Tripathi
AKHILESH TRIPATHI
Versus State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 88 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.
1. In compliance with the Court's order, the corpus has been produced before the Court.
2. Upon interaction with the parties, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.