SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 910

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Manisha Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW Manisha Yadav .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Technical Edu. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chinmay Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.

Court No. - 18 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.

The written instructions produced by the learned Standing Counsel for the State are taken on record.

By this petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing of the impugned order dated 04.04.2026 passed by the respondent No. 2 whereby maternity leave sought by the petitioner has been rejected. The impugned order dated

04.04.2026 contained in Annexure No. 1 is extracted hereinunder:-

"

मनीषा यादव [1535740), किनष्ठ सहायक, राजकीय पॉिलटिेक्नक जमुिनया डीह हरख बाराबंकी बाराबंकी को अवकाश आवेदन संख्या 2901211 के क्रम में िदनाक 06/04/2026 से 02/10/2026 तक 180 िदन का

मातृत्व अवकाश िनम्निलिखत िटप्पणी/िटप्पिणयों के साथ अस्वीकृत िकया जाता ह।ै

IV िटप्पणीः अनुमन्य नहीं। आवेिदत अवकाश िवत्तीयहस्तपुिस्तका खण्डदोभागाासे स0िन0153 (1) में प्रावधानके अनुसार स्वीकृत करने की इजाजत नहीं देता आप क

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top