IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SAMIT GOPAL, J.
Ram Palat and Another – Appellants
Versus
State – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1158 of 1989
Decided On : 24-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and factual record of the criminal case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 2. contentions regarding the legality of section 149 ipc conviction. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 3. legal requirements and precedents for constituting an unlawful assembly. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. inapplicability of section 149 ipc when less than five members are convicted. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 5. final order of acquittal due to lack of a valid unlawful assembly. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
SAMIT GOPAL, J.
1. This appeal was initially preferred by Ram Palat/appellant no. 1 and Bigranchhu/appellant no. 2 against the judgment and order dated 3.5.1989 passed by Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Basti in Session Trial No. 418 of 1986, State of U.P. vs. Ram Palat and others , by which the accused/appellants have been convicted and sentenced for the offences under Sections 323/149 I.P.C. to six months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.500.00 each and in default of payment of fine, they have been directed to undergo further one month imprisonment.
2. During pendency of this appeal the appellant no. 1/Ram Palat died and thus vide order dated 13.09.2022 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court his appeal stood abated. The same thus survived only for the appellant no. 2/Bigranchhu.
3. The case in the present matter was committed to the Court of Sessions for accused Ram Palat,cv Paras Nath, Raja Ram, Suresh, Bigranchoo, Mata Badal and Bigrail @ Janardan under Sections 147, 307/149 and 379 I.P.C. During pendency of trial, accused Raja Ram died and thus his trial stood abated (stated in para-2 of the impugned judgement and order).
4. Ram Palat, Paras Nath, Suresh, Bigranchoo, Mata Badal and Bigrail @ Janardan were tried wherein Paras Nath, Suresh, Mata Badal, Bigrail @ Janardan were acquitted of the charges levelled against them for offences under Sections 147, 307/149, 379 I.P.C. The accused Ram Palat and Bigranchoo were also charged for offences under Sections 147, 307/149, 379 I.P.C. and were acquitted of the said charges but were convicted for the offence under Sections 323/149 I.P.C. and sentenced therein as stated above.
5. An application dated 13.3.1987 was given by Ramdas Upadhyay to S.H.O. Police Station Kotwali, District Basti of which Kapil Muni Pandey was the scribe, alleging therein that his son Raghuvansh Upadhyay was Manager of Dayanand Vidyalay Malviya Road, Basti. He had a plot of land in Gidhi (Jigna), near petrol pump and besides his land, the land of Ram Palat was situated. With regards to dispute between him and Ram Palat regarding boundary of the land, his son Raghuvansh Upadhyay on 13.3.1986 at about 07.00 a.m. went to the land wherein on seeing the informant and his son, the accused armed with lathi and danda reached there and with an intention to murder his son on the exhortation of Ram Palat that “how could he dare to purchase the land besides his land and he may be murdered”, all the accused armed with lathi and danda assaulted him. The informant tried to save his son. The accused also assaulted the informant. On shouts by the informant and his son, Ramchandar, Virendra Bahadur Pandey, Hasnain and many other people reached there and saw the incident. Raghuvansh Upadhyay his son received serious injuries on his head, hands and legs and he also received injury. The accused have snatched and taken away a Reiko wrist watch, one gold ring of 8 ana, one silver ring with stone of 6 ana, Rs.735.00 kept in the pocket, one rexine bag containing papers of the land and papers of motorcycle, driving license, from the place one sofaset of bamboo, one big dari, two buckets have been taken away by them. His report be lodged and action be taken. The said application is marked as Ext. Ka-1 to the records.
6. On the basis of the said application a First Information Report was lodged on 13.03.1986 at about 8.30 a.m. as Case Crime No. 115 of 1986, under S
The judgment established that even if Section 149 IPC is not attracted, the appellants could still be convicted with the aid of Section 34 IPC if the common intention to commit the crime and the part....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of members of an unlawful assembly under the Indian Penal Code, particularly the application of Sections 141, 143, 144, 146, and 149 ....
The court emphasized the necessity of direct evidence of participation in unlawful assembly and cautioned against assumptions of guilt based solely on group association.
The court upheld the convictions under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, and 302, affirming that all members of an unlawful assembly are liable for offences committed in furtherance of a common object.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.