SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 922

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Ram Palat And Another – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner: Pardeep Narayan Pandey and Ramanand Pandey
Respondent: G.A.

Reserved on:07.04.2026 Delivered on: 24.04.2026 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Ram Palat and another …..Appellant(s)

Versus State …..Respondent(s)

Counsel for Appellant(s) : Pardeep Narayan Pandey, Ramanand Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 75 A.F.R.

HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.

1. This appeal was initially preferred by Ram Palat/appellant no. 1 and Bigranchhu/appellant no. 2 against the judgment and order dated 3.5.1989 passed by Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Basti in Session Trial No. 418 of 1986, State of U.P. vs. Ram Palat and 6 others, by which the accused/appellants have been convicted and sentenced for the offences under Sections 323/149 I.P.C. to six months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.500.00 each and in default of payment of fine, they have been directed to undergo further one month imprisonment.

2. During pendency of this appeal the appellant no. 1/Ram Palat died and thus vide order dated 13.09.2022 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court his appeal stood abated. The same thus survived only for the appellant no. 2/Bigranchhu.

3. The case in the present matter was committed to the Court of Sessions for accused Ram Palat,cv Paras Nath, Raja Ram,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top