HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW A.F.R.

Ram Laut Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. Thur. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Higher Eud. And Ors.

.....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, Mrs. Seema Srivastava, Pankaj Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, Savitra Vardhan Singh Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.

CMA No.95359 of 2018 - Application for substitution

1. Heard learned counsel for the the parties.

2. In paragraph 3 of the affidavit filed in support of the application, it has been stated that wife of the petitioner is legal heir, who has to be substituted on the place of petitioner No.2.

3. In view of reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the application is allowed.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to carry out necessary incorporation in the array of parties during course of the day.

Order on Writ Petition

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional CSC for the respondent - State.

2. In the year 1978 the petitioners were initially appointed on the posts of Routine Grade Clerk in the office of the Registrar of the respondent No.3 w.e.f. 29.05.1978 and 24.0