IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
AJIT KUMAR, INDRAJEET SHUKLA
Central Bank Of India Branch Khatauli Muzaffarnagar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Indrajeet Shukla, J.
Ref: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.02 of 2026
1. Cause shown for delay in filing the restoration application is sufficient. Delay in filing the restoration application is condoned.
2. The delay condonation application is accordingly allowed.
Ref: Civil Misc. Restoration Application No.03 of 2026
1. Cause shown is sufficient. The Restoration Application is allowed.
2. The order dated 16.09.2025 is recalled.
3. The Writ Petition is restored to its original number and status.
Ref: Writ Petition
1. Heard Shri Krishna Raj Singh Jadaun, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Chandra Prakash Yadav, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the correctness of recovery citation dated 18.03.2008 issued by 4th respondent/Tehsildar, Tehsil Jansath now Khatauli, District Muzaffarnagar contained as Annexure No.10 to the writ petition.
3. The factual matrix giving rise to instant writ petition is, the petitioner is Nationalized Bank registered under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970. The petitioner- Bank lent a loan to M/s Deep Chand Sushil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.