Malishka @ Malishka Fatma – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
Malishka @ Malishka Fatma .....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jaideep Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Chandra Vijai Singh, G.A., Shailendra Pratap Singh Court No. - 71 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
1. Heard Sri Jaideep Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Chandra Vijai Singh, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Prankaj Saxena, learned AGA-I for the State.
2. The present anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 21 of 2026, under Sections 3, 5(1) of U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, P.S.
Bilari, District Moradabad during pendency of the trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the accused/applicant has been falsely implicated in the FIR dated 22.01.2026 for the offences alleged under U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. The FIR is lodged by the brother of victim against five named persons. The allegation in the FIR i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.