SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1021

Malishka @ Malishka Fatma – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.

Malishka @ Malishka Fatma .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jaideep Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Chandra Vijai Singh, G.A., Shailendra Pratap Singh Court No. - 71 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Jaideep Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Chandra Vijai Singh, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Prankaj Saxena, learned AGA-I for the State.

2. The present anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 21 of 2026, under Sections 3, 5(1) of U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, P.S.

Bilari, District Moradabad during pendency of the trial.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the accused/applicant has been falsely implicated in the FIR dated 22.01.2026 for the offences alleged under U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. The FIR is lodged by the brother of victim against five named persons. The allegation in the FIR i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top