SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1031

Komal Lakhani – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Smt Komal Lakhani .....Revisionist(s)

Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Dileep Kumar Shukla, Kaushal Kumar, Mohit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sujan Singh Court No. - 40 HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

1. Heard Sri Mohit Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Sujan Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The instant criminal revision has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 12.07.2024 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Agra, in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Rakatganj, Agra, whereby an amount of Rs. 15,000/- per month has been awarded to the revisionist towards maintenance from opposite party no. 2, her husband, with effect from 14.03.2022. The revisionist seeks enhancement of the amount so awarded.

3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 31.08.2014 at Ahmedabad according to Sikh rites and ceremonies. It is not in dispute that the opposite party no. 2 is engaged in business at Ahmedabad under the name and style of M/s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top