SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1067

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SANJAY AND 4 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Sanjay And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Firdos Ahmad, Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Court No. - 54 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Firdos Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Tarun Gaur, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents and Mr. Sudhir Bharti, learned counsel for the respondent-gaon sabha.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent no.3/Consolidation Officer, Padrauna, Kushinagar to get the approval/sanction for issuing Parvana for Amaldaramad (Implementation) of Arazi No.344/.52 hectare and Arązi no.690/.69 hectare (Gram Sabha Land) situated at Village Turkaha, Tehsil Padrauna, District Kushinagar in the name of petitioner in revenue record in pursuance of order dated 10.01.2017 and 19.05.2017 under Rule 109 U.P.C.H. Rules in Case No.58II/2016-17 (Vishwakarma Vs. case Land Management Committee) from respondent no.2.

(b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top