SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1071

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
S/S UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAX UP LUCKNOW – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 69 of 2024 S/S Universal Enterprises .....Revisionist(s)

Versus The Commissioner Commercial Tax Up Lucknow .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Aditya Pandey, Rahul Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : C.S.C.

Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.

1. Heard Shri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned ACSC for the State - respondents.

2. This is a revision petition filed for the assessment year 2016-17 under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as " the Act") against the order dated February 22, 2024 passed by Commercial Tax Tribunal, Moradabad in Second Appeal No. 265/2024 for the assessment year 2016-17.

3. The above-noted revision was admitted by this Court vide order dated

23.05.2024 on the following question of law:-

"A. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Commercial Tax Tribunal as well as the authorities below were legally justified in rejecting the account books of the applicant and making the best judgment assessment when no adverse material was available on record against the applicant?

C. Whether on the facts and circumsta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top