SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1073

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUKKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Sukkar .....Appellant(s)

Versus State of U.P.

.....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Appellant(s) : Arvind Singh, Sadhana Singh(A.C.), M.K.Sharma, R.K.Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.G.A.

Court No. - 82 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

1. The instant criminal appeal, has been filed by the accused-appellants Sukkar, Chauhal, Parmal and Beeja all residents of village Simlana, Police Station Badgaon, District Saharanpur against the Judgement and order of conviction dated 14.06.1983 passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Saharanpur in Sessions Trial No. 169 of 1982 (Stae Vs. Sukkar and others) Police Station Badagaon, District Saharanpur, whereby sentencing the appellants to undergo for R.I. of five years for the offence under Sections 307/34 I.P.C., and six months R.I. for the offence under Sections 324/34 I.P.C. Both the sentences shall run concurrently.

2. During the pendency of the instant appeal, the accused appellants nos. nos. 1, 2, 4 namely Sukkar, Chauhal and Beeja have died and the instant appeal as against them have already been abated vide order dated

16.01.2026 passed by co-ordinate Bench of of this court.

3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top