SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1076

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHIVANSH PANDEY @ SHIVANK PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8578 of 2026 Shivansh Pandey @ Shivank Pandey .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.262 of 2025, under Sections 140(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of BNS, Police Station- Padari, District-

Mirzapur.

3. The Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant in the First Information Report or in the statement of the injured. The injured has not received any grievous injury. The Learned counsel for the applicant further contends that the similarly situated co-accused viz. Azahar has been granted regular bail by this Court vide its order dated 19.02.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 6112 of 2026 (Azahar Vs. State of U.P.). The case of the appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top