ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHIVANSH PANDEY @ SHIVANK PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8578 of 2026 Shivansh Pandey @ Shivank Pandey .....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.262 of 2025, under Sections 140(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of BNS, Police Station- Padari, District-
Mirzapur.
3. The Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant in the First Information Report or in the statement of the injured. The injured has not received any grievous injury. The Learned counsel for the applicant further contends that the similarly situated co-accused viz. Azahar has been granted regular bail by this Court vide its order dated 19.02.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 6112 of 2026 (Azahar Vs. State of U.P.). The case of the appl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.