SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1124

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SURAJ SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15506 of 2026 Suraj Singh .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 69 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

1. Heard Sri Ashutosh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Radhey Shyam, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.

2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 76 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 336, 338, 340, 341, 3(5) and 61(2) BNS and Section 66D of IT Act, registered at Police Station AIIMS, District Gorakhpur, during pendency of the trial.

3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he has been languishing in jail since 23.3.2026. It is further submitted that co-accused Dhruv Sahni and Akhand Pratap Singh@Vikki Singh have already been granted bail by this Court and the role of the applicant is not distinguishable from the role of co-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top