SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1130

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PANKAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15537 of 2026 Pankaj .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jay Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.

1. Heard Sri Jay Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Kunwar Tejandra Bahadur, learned AGA for the State.

2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 540 of 2024, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Bisauli, District Budaun during pendency of the trial.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, however, applicant is husband of the deceased but on the basis of false allegation he has been made accused in the present matter.

4. He further submits, marriage of the applicant was solemnized with the deceased in July, 2022 and after marriage with their wedlock however two children were born one female child and one male child but unfortunately both died and this fact is even evident from the statement of informant recorded during investigation which has been annexed along with instant bail application. He

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top