HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Prabhakar Pandit .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Kumar Pandey, Radhey Krishna Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.

Court No. - 34 (Sl.No.75)

HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.

1. Heard Sri Radhey Krishna Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dileep Kesarwani, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.

2. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the order dated 11.02.20216 whereby the representation of the petitioner was rejected and the orders dated 08.03.2011 and 24.08.2011, which were passed after the retirement of the petitioner for recovery of the excess amount paid to the petitioner due to wrong fixation of pay scale.

3. The briefly stated facts of the case are that the petitioner herein was appointed as Assistant Prosecution Officer in the office of Senior Prosecution Officer, District Allahabad on 02.08.1976 and thereafter he retired on 28.02.2011 from the post of Senior Prosecution Officer, Deoria. After his retirement, before releasing the retiral dues to the petitioner, the respondents have stated that the pet