HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Sachin .....Revisionist(s)

Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Akhileshwar Pratap Singh, Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 86 HON'BLE SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionists as well as learned A.G.A. on the point of admission.

The present criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist with prayer to allow the revision and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 02.02.2026 passed by learned Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (Dacodity Affected Area), Budaun in Special Session Case No. 668 of 2020 (State Vs. Rohit and others), under Section 392 IPC and also allow the application dated 12.01.2026 filed by the revisionist under Section 311 Cr.P.C. /348 BNSS to summon the opposite party no. 3 for re-examination.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case, the P.W. 2 was examined before the learned trial court but some questions were left unasked on the part of the accused/revisionist that was the reason an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was moved before the learned trial court to recall t