SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1176

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SATENDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4000 of 2026 Satendra .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.

1. Heard Sri Dhiraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.N. Pandey, learned AGA for the State.

2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 402 of 2025, under Sections 316(5) B.N.S., Police Station Budhana, District Muzaffar Nagar, during pendency of the trial.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, applicant was manager in a finance company and as per allegation he along with collection agents misappropriated huge public money and as per specific allegation applicant embezzled amount ofRs. 8,30,682/-

but entire allegation levelled against the applicant are totally false.

4. He further argued, actually collection agents after collecting the money from the fields were having responsibility to deposit the same in the company but when applicant came to know that after collecting money they are not depositing the money then on 14.5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top