SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1199

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VINEET – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14269 of 2026 Vineet .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saksham Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.

1. Supplementary affidavit filed by the applicant is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Saksham Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Imran Khan, learned AGA for the State.

3. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 27 of 2026, under Sections 308(5), 61(2) BNS, Police Station Ghandhi Park, District Aligarh during pendency of the trial.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, FIR of the present case was lodged against co-accused Yash Thakur and unknown persons with regard to extortion but during investigation on the basis of statement of co-accused and confessional statement of applicant before police he has been made accused in the present matter and except the confessional statement of applicant and co-accused there is no other evidence against the applicant on record.

5. He further submits, actually unfortunately apart from the prese

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top