##PAGE1##

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14321 of 2026

Rohit @ Keera

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite

Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Bind

Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Bind, learned counsel for the applicant and

Sri Uma Shanker Mishra, learned AGA for the State-respondents

and perused the record.

2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of

applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.

173 of 2025, under Sections 109(1) BNS and Sections 3/35/27

Arms Act, registered at Police Station Kampil, District Farrukhabad,

during pendency of the trial.

3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that

applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this

case and he has been languishing in jail since 30.10.2025. It is

further submitted that the no police personnel is said to have

received injury of fire arm in the alleged incident and on the

contrary the applicant is said to have received injury on his leg. It is

further submitted that one country-made pistol and Rs. 330/- are

said to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. I

t is further submitted that applicant is having criminal history which

has been duly explained in the memo of application. It is also

submitted that the applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the

liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of

heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any

BAIL No. 14321 of 2026

2

early conclusion of trial.

4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for

grant of bail to the applicant and it is submitted that the applicant is

having seven criminal history of similar nature.

5. No police personnel is said to have received injury of fire arm in

the alleged incident and on the contrary the applicant is said to

have received injury on his leg. One country-made pistol and Rs.

330/- are said to have been recovered from the possession of the

applicant. The applicant is having criminal history which has been

duly explained in the memo of application.

6. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence

reflected from record and without expressing any opinion on merits

of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail

application is ALLOWED

7. Let the applicant- Rohit @ Keera involved in the aforesaid case

crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.

50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions :-

(i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the

facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts

to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution

witnesses.

(iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial

court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of

charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of

B.N.S.S.

(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall

not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the

BAIL No. 14321 of 2026

3

witnesses are present in the trial court.

(v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each

date fixed, either personally or through his counsel.

8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a

ground for cancellation of bail.

9. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the

purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way

be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial

court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent

conclusions on the basis of evi