SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1223

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SAVITA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15240 of 2026 Savita .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mayank Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

1. Copy of postmortem report as well as viscera report of the deceased produced by learned AGA, is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P.Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-respondent.

3. The present bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 248 of 2025, under Section 108 BNS, Police Station Charwa, District Kaushambi during the pendency of trial.

4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is the wife of the deceased and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The incident is alleged to have occurred on 20.06.2025, whereas the first information report was lodged on 15.12.2025. The inordinate delay in lodging the first information report is fatal to the prosecution case. As per the postmortem report, the cause of death is uncertain. Viscera was preserved and sent for chemical analysi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top