ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SAVITA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15240 of 2026 Savita .....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mayank Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Copy of postmortem report as well as viscera report of the deceased produced by learned AGA, is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P.Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-respondent.
3. The present bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 248 of 2025, under Section 108 BNS, Police Station Charwa, District Kaushambi during the pendency of trial.
4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is the wife of the deceased and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The incident is alleged to have occurred on 20.06.2025, whereas the first information report was lodged on 15.12.2025. The inordinate delay in lodging the first information report is fatal to the prosecution case. As per the postmortem report, the cause of death is uncertain. Viscera was preserved and sent for chemical analysi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.