SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1239

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAMCHANDRA YADAV @ MAIKU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15379 of 2026 Ramchandra Yadav @ Maiku .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Siddharth Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard Learned counsel for the applicant, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 77 of 2026, under Section 2(b)(1), 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, registered at P.S.

Jiyanpur, District Azamgarh, during the pendency of his trial.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of single base case shown in the gang chart, in which he has been bailed out. The criminal history of the applicant was considered by this Court while granting bail to him in the base case. The Learned counsel for the applicant further contends that the similarly situated co-accused namely Ram Ashish Yadav and Saurabh @ Kariya, who are said to be members of the gang have been granted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top