SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1250

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
CHHATRAPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Chhatrapal .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hare Krishna Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Yogesh Kumar Tiwari Court No. - 82 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the first informant and perused the material on record.

2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No. 148 of 2019 (State Vs. Chhatrapal) arising out of Case Crime No.55 of 2019 under Sections 420, 494, 354-Gha, 366, 376, 506 I.P.C., pending before leanred Additional District Judge-9th, District Jhansi pursuant to the compromise entered into between the parties.

3. Vide order dated 13.03.2023, the co-ordinate Bench of this Court had referred the matter before the concerned trial below for verification of the compromise entered into between the parties. The learned trial Court vide its report dated 31.03.2023 has reported that the matter has been compromised between the parties. copy of which report is on record.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top