SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1267

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SANJAY BHATNAGAR – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. AND 28 OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Sanjay Bhatnagar .....Petitioner(s)

Versus Board Of Revenue U.P. And 28 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sr. Advocate, Umang Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shyam Mani Shukla Court No. - 55 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

1. Heard Sri Anupam Kulshrestha, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Umang Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1, 2, 3, 28 & 29. Sri Shyam Mani Shukla has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 27.

2. The present petition has been filed challenging the orders passed by the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3, dated 20.11.2018; 06.11.2017 & 27.08.2013, respectively, arising out of proceedings under Section 176 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, for division of holding; and the order dated 27.08.2025, passed by the respondent no. 1, rejecting the review application filed by the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 20.11.2018.

3. The facts of the case are that a suit for division of holding was filed by the respondent nos. 4 & 5 alongwith their mother Asha Rani, who is no more. The said suit was initially dismissed as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top