ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ASGAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4603 of 2026 Asgar .....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saurabh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rakesh Chandra, G.A.
Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Saurabh Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Chandra, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Rajiv Dhar Dwivedi, learned AGA for the State.
3. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.810 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonbhadra, during pendency of the trial.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, however, applicant is husband of the deceased but on the basis of false allegation he has been made accused in the present matter.
5. He further argued, actually native place of the applicant is District Sonbhadra and deceased used to reside their but applicant resided in Varanasi as he was rickshaw puller in District Varanasi. He next submits, deceased also insisted t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.