SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1302

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ASGAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4603 of 2026 Asgar .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saurabh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rakesh Chandra, G.A.

Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.

1. Rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Saurabh Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Chandra, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Rajiv Dhar Dwivedi, learned AGA for the State.

3. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.810 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonbhadra, during pendency of the trial.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, however, applicant is husband of the deceased but on the basis of false allegation he has been made accused in the present matter.

5. He further argued, actually native place of the applicant is District Sonbhadra and deceased used to reside their but applicant resided in Varanasi as he was rickshaw puller in District Varanasi. He next submits, deceased also insisted t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top