ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ANKIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5030 of 2026 Ankit .....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Tanay Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Vijay Shanker, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Tanay Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Kunwar Tejendra Bahadur Singh, learned AGA for the State.
3. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.23 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 109, 309(5) BNS, Police Station Baraut, District Baghpat, during pendency of the trial.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, according to the FIR, 3-4 unknown persons caused knife injuries to the son of the informant and during investigation applicant has been made accused.
5. He further argued, according to the prosecution, incident was also witnessed by uncle of the injured Liyaqat and he however, disclosed the name of the applicant along with Rajan but only general role has been assigned by him to all
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.