SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1311

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NARENDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12519 of 2026 Narendra .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishika Raj Singhal, Shivendra Raj Singhal, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rajesh Kumar Kanojia, G.A.

Court No. - 90 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J.

1. Heard Sri Dharmendra Singhal, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Shivendra Raj Singhal, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajesh Kumar Kanojia, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the material brought on record.

2. The present third bail application has been filed by the applicant- accused in Case Crime No.95 of 2021, under Sections - 147, 148, 149, 323, 427, 441, 447, 307, 302, 506, 34 I.P.C., Police Station- Falavda, District- Meerut with the prayer to enlarge the applicant-accused on bail. The second bail application of applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 16.01.2025.

3. Learned Senior counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It was submitted that the first information report was lodged against 13 accused p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top