ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NARENDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12519 of 2026 Narendra .....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishika Raj Singhal, Shivendra Raj Singhal, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rajesh Kumar Kanojia, G.A.
Court No. - 90 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Dharmendra Singhal, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Shivendra Raj Singhal, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajesh Kumar Kanojia, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the material brought on record.
2. The present third bail application has been filed by the applicant- accused in Case Crime No.95 of 2021, under Sections - 147, 148, 149, 323, 427, 441, 447, 307, 302, 506, 34 I.P.C., Police Station- Falavda, District- Meerut with the prayer to enlarge the applicant-accused on bail. The second bail application of applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 16.01.2025.
3. Learned Senior counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It was submitted that the first information report was lodged against 13 accused p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.