SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1316

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13958 of 2026 Babu .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Samnani Ali, Mohd Raghib Ali Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 69 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

1. Heard Shri Mohd. Raghib Ali, learned counsel for the applicant, and Shri Radhey Shyam, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.

2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant, with a prayer to release him on bail in FIR No.124 of 2026, under Sections 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, registered at Police Station Lohiyanagar, District Meerut, during pendency of the trial.

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. It is further submitted that co-accused Zakir has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.04.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.13980 of 2026. It is further submitted that the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top