SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1344

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SAHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15039 of 2026 Sahil .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ranjan Dhwaj Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.40 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352, 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station- Nichlaul, District-

Maharajganj.

3. The Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant has been wrongly named in the First Information Report as Shahid, however, his name is Sahil. He further contends that a general role has been given to the applicant and the other accused of using blunt and sharp edged weapons to assault the injured. The injured has received two visible injuries one is an incised looking lacerated wound of size 2.5 c.m. x 0.5 c.m. on the occipital area and the other is lacerated wound of size 2 c.m. x 0.2 c.m. on the right index

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top