SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1357

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
JUNAID – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15165 of 2026 Junaid .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bharat Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 67 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 531 of 2025, under Sections-190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 103(1) BNS, Police Station- Bhamaura, District-

Bareilly, during the pendency of the trial.

3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that though in the FIR, general allegation has been made against 14 persons regarding beating Babu and Javed. Subsequently, Babu succumbed to injuries. However, the injured Javed in his first statement did not make any allegation against the applicant. Thereafter, the second statement of first informant was recorded wherein he had contradicted with the statement of Javed regarding non-involvement of the applicant and two other named accused then he could not give sat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top