ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
JUNAID – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15165 of 2026 Junaid .....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bharat Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 67 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 531 of 2025, under Sections-190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 103(1) BNS, Police Station- Bhamaura, District-
Bareilly, during the pendency of the trial.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that though in the FIR, general allegation has been made against 14 persons regarding beating Babu and Javed. Subsequently, Babu succumbed to injuries. However, the injured Javed in his first statement did not make any allegation against the applicant. Thereafter, the second statement of first informant was recorded wherein he had contradicted with the statement of Javed regarding non-involvement of the applicant and two other named accused then he could not give sat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.