ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BACHCHU SINGH AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Bachchu Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s)
Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nisheeth Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Learned Standing Counsel placed Instructions dated
26.04.2026 before the Court, the same is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents.
3. It is argued by Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner that apart from all the three petitioners, two similarly situated persons namely Saurabh Sharma and Sachin Sharma who were not promoted and their results were kept in a sealed cover due to pendency of criminal case, approached this Court by filing Writ A No.15474 of 2024 which was finally decided by this Court vide order dated 18.02.2025. Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that pursuant to the aforesaid order, consequential order has been passed by the Deputy Police Commissioner, Ghaziabad Commissionerate in favour of the aforesaid persons on 19.04.2025, copy of the same is appended at Page 156 of the writ petition. Learn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.