SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1364

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BACHCHU SINGH AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Bachchu Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nisheeth Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.

Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

1. Learned Standing Counsel placed Instructions dated

26.04.2026 before the Court, the same is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents.

3. It is argued by Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner that apart from all the three petitioners, two similarly situated persons namely Saurabh Sharma and Sachin Sharma who were not promoted and their results were kept in a sealed cover due to pendency of criminal case, approached this Court by filing Writ A No.15474 of 2024 which was finally decided by this Court vide order dated 18.02.2025. Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that pursuant to the aforesaid order, consequential order has been passed by the Deputy Police Commissioner, Ghaziabad Commissionerate in favour of the aforesaid persons on 19.04.2025, copy of the same is appended at Page 156 of the writ petition. Learn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top