HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Shiv Shankar Richhariya .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chetan Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.

Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the writ petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner was appointed as Constable in Civil Police on 01.10.1984 and he retired as Sub-Inspector on 30.06.2025, however, post- retirement on 01.09.2025, the Assistant Police Commissioner on behalf of the Commissioner of Police, Agra proceeded to deduct an amount of Rs.5,70,849/- with respect to the alleged excess payment, which was not liable to be paid to the writ petitioner. Aggrieved with the aforesaid order, the petitioner approached this Court by filing Writ A No.16824 of 2025 (Shiv Shankar Richhariya Vs. State of U.P.and others) (Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:199819) which was decided by this Court vide order dated 12.11.2025 reads as follows:-

1. Heard Sri Chetan Prakash, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Vijay Lal, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed as Consta