SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1367

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SURENDRA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Surendra And Another .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of Up And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramakant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C.

Court No. - 55 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

1. Heard Sri Ramakant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents, Sri Amit Gupta, holding brief of Sri B. K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent Gaon Sabha and Sri Ashutosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.6.

2. The present petition has been filed challenging the orders passed by respondent nos.2, 3 and 4, dated 23.12.1997, 07.12.2023 and 29.10.2025, respectively, arising out of proceedings under Section 9-A(2) of the U.P.

Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.

3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that on the basis of their possession over plot nos.545/2, they filed an objection before the Consolidation Officer claiming rights under Section 122-B(4- F) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The aforesaid objection was rejected by the Consolidation Officer vide order dated 23.12.19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top