SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1395

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
UMASHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1070 of 2026 Umashankar .....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brij Raj Singh, Raj Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

1. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 11.8.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.21467 of 2025 (Umashankar Vs. State of U.P.) leaving it open for the applicant to move the second bail application after recording the statements of the victim/abductee before the trial Court.

2. A supplementary affidavit has been filed in Court today, is taken on the record. The statement of the victim recorded as on 10.04.2026 has been filed which indicates that the cross examination of the witness is still continuing.

3. Today, when the case has been called on, the Learned A.G.A. prays that he may be granted a week's time to seek instructions in the matter whether the statement of the victim is complete.

4. This Court vide its order dated 10.03.2026 had observed as under:-

"1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per the

order of Ho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top