SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 97157

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J
Amit – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18569 of 2026 | Case Crime No. 520 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shailendra Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: G.A., Rakesh Kumar

Bail may be granted when the victim's statement contradicts the FIR allegations, the charge sheet has been filed, and the accused has no criminal history, rendering further custodial interrogation unnecessary.

Headnote:The applicant sought bail in a case involving allegations under Sections 65(1), 137(2), and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 5J(II)6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant enticed the daughter of the informant. However, the victim's statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) indicated that she left her home voluntarily and that no wrong was committed by the applicant. The court noted that the charge sheet had been filed and the applicant had no criminal history. The primary issue was whether the applicant was entitled to bail during the trial. The court reasoned that since the victim's statements contradicted the FIR allegations and the charge sheet had already been filed, custodial interrogation was no longer necessary. The court further considered the nature of the offence and the complicity of the accused. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

Table of Content
1. procedural initiation of a bail application and case details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. contradiction between fir allegations and victim's statement. (Para 3 , 4)
3. entitlement to bail based on evidence and lack of criminal history. (Para 5)
4. terms of bail and administrative directions for early release. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)

1. Heard Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Kumar, counsel for the first informant, Sri Roshan Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during trial in Case Crime No. 520 of 2025, under Sections 65(1), 137 (2), 87 of B.N.S and Section 5J(II)6 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Khorabar, District Gorakhpur.

3. Counsel for the applicant submitted that though in the FIR allegation has been made that the applicant has enticed away the daughter of the first informant but the victim in her statement under Section 180 and 183 BNSS clearly stated that she herself left the house and no wrong has been committed by the present applicant, therefore, the applicant has not committed any offence. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 06.04.2026. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. as well as counsel for the first informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed

6. Let the applicant- Amit involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

9. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

10. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or on e-prison portal and Trial Court via e-mode within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top