HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
KUNWER PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
A482/18352/2021
A summoning order passed by a Magistrate on a printed proforma without applying judicial mind is unsustainable and liable to be quashed.
Headnote:
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - COMPLAINT CASE - SUMMONING ORDER - [The summoning order passed by the Magistrate on a printed proforma without applying judicial mind is unsustainable and liable to be quashed.]
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was summoned by the Magistrate in a complaint case under Sections 4 and 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, on a printed proforma without applying judicial mind.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the summoning order passed by the Magistrate on a printed proforma without applying judicial mind is unsustainable and liable to be quashed.
Issues: Whether the summoning order passed by the Magistrate on a printed proforma without applying judicial mind is sustainable?
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the following principles:- It is well settled that before a Magistrate can be said to have taken cognizance of an offence, it is imperative that he must have taken notice of the accusations and applied his mind to the allegations made in the complaint or in the police report or the information received from a source other than a police report, as the case may be, and the material filed therewith.- Cognizance of an offence is taken by the Magistrate under Chapter XIV Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.- Chapter XV Cr.P.C. deals with the further procedure for dealing with "Complaints To Magistrate".- Chapter XVI Cr.P.C. deals with "Commencement of Proceeding before Magistrate".- The Magistrate is not required to pass a detailed reasoned order at the time of taking cognizance on the charge sheet, but it does not mean that the order of taking cognizance can be passed by filling up the blanks on a printed proforma.- At the time of passing any judicial order including the order taking cognizance on the charge sheet, the Court is required to apply judicial mind and even the order of taking cognizance cannot be passed in a mechanical manner.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application and quashed the impugned summoning order dated 29.01.2018 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah. The Magistrate was directed to pass a fresh order after applying the judicial mind within two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18352 of 2021
Applicant :- Kunwer Pal Singh
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Shishir Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the
State of U.P./opposite parties and perused the record.
The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with
a prayer to quash the summoning order dated 29.01.2018 and
entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 484 of 2018 (State Vs.
Kunwer Pal Singh), under Section 4 and 21 of the Mines and
Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Police
Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Etah, pending in the court of
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah.
Record reflects that a complaint under Sections 4 and 21 of the
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957
and under Rules 3, 57 and 70 of the Uttar Pradesh Minor
Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 was filed on 20.01.2018 by
the opposite party no. 2/Mines Inspector, Etah against the
applicant, on which learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah vide
order dated 29.01.2018 took cognizance and summoned the
applicant under Section 4 and 21 of the Mines and Minerals
(Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 on a printed
proforma.
Learned counsel for the applicant assailing the impugned
summoning order dated 29.01.2018 submits that the learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate has not applied his judicial mind in
passing the summoning order dated 29.01.2018, as the same has
been passed on a printed proforma already prepared for
summoning the accused in a police case after submission of
charge sheet, whereas in this case complaint has been filed by
the opposite party no. 2 and there is no police report under
Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. It is next submitted that the applicant has
been summoned without following due procedure provided for
the compliant case under Chapter XIV and XV Cr.P.C.,
therefore, the same is not sustainable and liable to be quashed.
Learned A.G.A. has also admitted that procedure of complaint
case has not been followed in this case and impugned
summoning order dated 29.01.2018 has been passed on a
printed proforma by filling up the blanks, which has been
prepared for summoning the accused after submission of charge
sheet in police case and prayed that the matter may be
remanded to the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate with the
direction to pass a fresh order.
Having heard the arguments of learned counsel for the parties, it
is relevant to mentioned that it is well settled that before a
Magistrate can be said to have taken cognizance of an offence,
it is imperative that he must have taken notice of the
accusations and applied his mind to the allegations made in the
complaint or in the police report or the information received
from a source other than a police report, as the case may be, and
the material filed therewith. It needs little emphasis that it is
only when the Magistrate applies his mind and is satisfied that
the allegations, if proved, would constitute an offence and
decides to initiate proceedings against the alleged offender, that
it can be positively stated that he has taken cognizance of the
offence.
Cognizance of an offence is taken by the Magistrate under
Chapter XIV Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973. Chapter XV Cr.P.C. deals with the further procedure for
dealing with "Complaints To Magistrate". Chapter XVI Cr.P.C.
deals with "Commencement of Proceeding before Magistrate".
It is very strange that in the present case learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate has not applied his mind and even did not take pain
to go through the complaint and applicant has been summoned
on a printed proforma, in which the name of the accused and
other details of the case have been filled up by hand. Even
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate did not bother