SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20898

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3396 - VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
V.RAMAKRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF A.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

Impugning the Judgment of acquittal passed in C.C.No.182 of 2004 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Madakasira, Anantapur District dated 25.04.2008, the complainant preferred the present appeal challenging the validity and correctness of the Judgment.

2. Appellant herein was the Complainant, Respondent No.2 herein was the accused before the trial Court and the State was shown as Respondent No.1.

3. When this matter is taken up for hearing, none represented for the Appellant. Notice which was sent to the accused returned as unserved. Despite the matter being listed for the fourth time, none represented for the Appellant. It is a Criminal Appeal of 2008 and this Court would like to dispose of the same on merits.

4. As can be seen from the record, the case of the Complainant is that accused borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- from the Complainant and in discharge of the said debt issued a cheque for Rs.1,00,000/- on 13.06.2004. The cheque was dishonoured with an endorsement „account closed‟ on 11.08.2004. Thereafter, the Complainant got issued a legal notice, which was served on the father of the accused, a reply has been issued by the accused on 03.07.2006. As the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top